20 Dec Wco Mutual Recognition Agreement
The ultimate goal should be to develop a multilateral mutual recognition agreement (MRA) to avoid the creation of new barriers to trade. However, bilateral MRAs will remain a reality for some time. To maximize the benefits of such an MRA, the WCO has developed MRA guidelines to support the development and implementation of such an MRA program. Summary: The guidelines provide progressive guidance for the preparation and conclusion of such a mutual recognition agreement, including the explanation of the difference between an agreement and an agreement. In this context, on 24 November 2014, Thai Customs signed an action plan with their Korean counterpart as an initiative to develop cooperation within the framework of the AEO Mutual Recognition Programme. This led to the agreement on mutual recognition. The AEO-MRA signing ceremony between the Thai Customs Administration and the South Korean Customs Office took place on 27 December 2016 at the Thai Customs Administration, during which Mr. Kulit Sombatsiri, Director General of Thai Customs, and Mr. Hong-uk Chun, Commissioner of Customs, signed the Mutual Recognition Agreement. The ICC has developed a recommendation for mutual recognition listing the key characteristics of each MRA in order to develop trade benefits: mutual recognition of the EOA refers to the mechanisms developed by customs administrations for mutual recognition of AEO validations and authorizations, as well as the results of customs control and other mechanisms that may be needed to eliminate or reduce redundant or redundant validation and authorisation efforts. The private sector makes mutual recognition the first tangible measure of trade facilitation, as they hope and believe that mutual recognition will avoid the costs of re-validation and inspection if two or more countries have agreed to recognize each other. Purpose: to help leaders plan and implement such agreements or agreements.
ICC Mutual Regognition Mutual Recognition Agreements When an AEOS holder applys for regulated agent (AR) or known sender (KC) status, the security requirements are deemed to be met to the extent that the criteria for issuing AEO status are identical or equivalent to those for RA or KC status. The same principle applies to the opposite. In the case of an account sender (CA), AEOS holders are not required to sign the “account sender” commitment and are recognized as AC by the regulated agent, provided that all other requirements under EU aviation safety legislation are met. The EU strategy and the action plan on customs risk management, and in particular the inclusion of a specific objective for inter-institutional cooperation and information exchange between customs and other authorities, have played a key role in this area.